Can Rituals be Creative?
To many people, the idea of “Creative Ritual” is an
Oximoron. The word “Ritual” conjures up notions of Fixed Tradition, Endless
Repetition down the ages, Rigid Belief Systems, a conservative Establishment,
adherence to Formal Rules ordained by a higher authority, an Unchanging
Symbolic System.
Early anthropologists, such as Friedrich Max Müller, Edward
B Tylor, William Robertson Smith and James Frazer, certainly saw ritual in
these terms. For them, change in ritual happened either very slowly over
centuries alongside changes in ways of life, or suddenly through conquest.
A century and a half of observation and debate has
established that, in reality, rituals change much more quickly than most people
imagine, and that claims of tradition are often invented.
The anthropologist Mary Douglas established a strong
correspondence between the nature of a society’s structure, and the nature of
its rituals: A society in which roles are strongly delineated, and authority is
rigid, do indeed have a great emphasis on tradition and rule-governance in
their rituals.
On the other hand, more liberal societies, in which it is
easy to change roles, and in which individuals are given a combination of
freedom and responsibility, have rituals which (though they might appeal to
tradition) change rapidly over time, and in which individual self-expression is
included, and even encouraged.
Ritual and Authority
My interest in belief systems and authority probably stems
from my education at a military school … Whereas I was born with my love of
nature, and colour.
These are the forces which have formed the direction of my
work over the last 27 years … through a degree in Natural Science, to a
doctorate investigating the nature of belief, and on into my creative career
which explores the relationships between people, their communities and their
surroundings.
I’m particularly interested in the fact that authority, and
belief systems which buttress that authority, can be imposed through rigid,
traditional ritual. Because the converse is also true: authority, and the
attendant belief systems, can be challenged through creative, self-expressive
ritual.
Self-expression, and the resultant self-awareness, are inherently
subversive. If people feel able to make decisions for themselves, they will be
less controllable. On the contrary, if authorities can limit, or even demonise,
self-awareness, then they can prevent individuals from making their own
decisions.
Ritual and Empowerment
These facts form the basis of my creative work, especially
my work with ritual and ceremony.
My ceremonies are carefully designed so as to avoid, as
completely as possible, the imposition of any belief system.
For each ceremony, I carefully research traditions from
around the globe, ancient and modern, and create a ritual ‘act’ or
‘performance’ which, while referring to other traditions, is both new and
potentially meaningful.
Finally, as far as is possible, I always include a section
for self-expression … inviting participants to reflect on the past, contemplate
the future, and express their hopes, desires and intentions in some form.
I create, or invite others to create, new works of art to
decorate ritual spaces, and new music and poetry for the performance. Thus,
participants are never confronted with the same set of symbols twice, and are
always led into providing their own interpretations for their surroundings, and
the rite as a whole.
The creative techniques I use all begin with self-awareness
exercises: forms of visual meditation, or embodied improvisation (musical or
gestural), or flow-of-consciousness writing. I then use a series of structural
techniques to work up the initial sketches and ideas into finished works.
The intended result is that participants can share in the
sense of commonality, community and well-being that ritual can bring, while preserving
or even developing their personal sense of spirituality, belief and empowerment,
without which life remains devoid of meaning … and from the feedback I receive,
it seems to work.